I visited an old corn mill powered by water and for the tourists they run the mill and grind some corn. I was able to set up the tripod and take some images to see the difference shutter speed might have on the image.
The first three images have an aperture of 2.8 providing quite a narrow depth of field and as the shutter speed increased the grindstone showed more detail. Of these three shots my preference is the centre timing, providing a real indication of speed, but with some definition
f2.8, 1/25 sec
f2.8, 1/60 sec
f10, 2 sec
I also took some comparative shots at f10, which given the light conditions (I didn't change the image speed) meant the shutter speed increased.
f10, 1.3 sec
______________________________________________________________________________
Panning with a slow('ish) shutter speed
All shots at f40, 1/8 sec
I have had little or no experience in panning and initially found this a bit tricky. I realised that to have some effect the camera needed to have a continuous movement in line with the subject whilst the shutter was pressed. I also knew that the slowish shutter speed would blur the background at the very least.
Altogether I am quite pleased with these results, the impression of speed is very definite and the blurred background of the sea is blurred in a lateral direction, whereas shots 3 and 5, which show a marked vertical movement must be made by the jet-sky riding the waves as the sea blur is consistent (relatively).
______________________________________________________________________________
Panning
I include this shot as a clear example of my lack of technique in panning. The shot was f11 , 1/1500 sec. and despite the speed of the shutter the gull was almost past me before the shot was taken. Note to author, more practise.
No comments:
Post a Comment